Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, fossil fuel is considered as the major source of energy. Some individuals think that using alternative sources should be encouraged in some nations. From my point of view, I think that approach brings a beneficial result to human society in the future.
On the one hand, there is a drawback of using replaced energy sources. When it comes to the economic aspect, the recreation of a new energy source might take a lot of expenditures and workforce to implement. Indeed, searching for a new energy source always challenges our knowledge and ability and it is not easy to do. For example, the trend of new energy source creation to operate and ride the vehicles is very popular in modern societies. However, so far scientists still cannot discover a new energy source that is not only reasonable but also is stable over time. Therefore, the creation of a new energy source is an activity consuming much money and labor forces.
On the other hand, making an alternative energy source to replace fossil fuel is also a positive approach. The new energy source can solve the common issue that all modern societies are facing now is the lack of supplemented energy. In addition, Fossil fuel is expected to be rare in the future in all developing countries. Thus, there is a need to find a new energy source to replace fossil fuel that is not only clean but also costs less money to use. Therefore, using a replaced energy source to fossil fuel is an optimum approach to deal with the lack of energy source issue.
In conclusion, in some nations, fossil fuel is encouraged to be replaced by a new energy source. In my opinion, I think this idea is the most perfect approach to carry out in the future in modern societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-18 | tttran12 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | Pau Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | hp_writing | 56 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 56
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 71
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in wh 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, fossil fuel is considered as t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... result to human society in the future. On the one hand, there is a drawback of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out in the future in modern societies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71287128713 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59343369539 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481848184818 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.9341690007 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.25 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452052344078 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168294426789 0.084324248473 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892530877861 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276459554326 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755631934403 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, fossil fuel is considered as t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... result to human society in the future. On the one hand, there is a drawback of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out in the future in modern societies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71287128713 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59343369539 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481848184818 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.9341690007 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.25 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452052344078 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168294426789 0.084324248473 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892530877861 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276459554326 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755631934403 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.