Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the development of technology has facilitated alternative energy usages in some countries, whereas the unrenewable ones still prevail in others. In my perspective, I totally agree with this tendency due to its benefits stemming from preservation.
On the one hand, fossil fuel becomes dominant due to several reasons. Firstly, the shortage of advanced technology has curbed the ubiquity of eco-friendly energy. It is the developing countries that have difficulties in approaching new manufacture using renewable powers such as solar or wind since their labor force has no sufficient knowledge and skills to manipulate those machines and plants. Thus, to maintain the economy, they would only exploit available resources and transfer them into energy by obsolete engines, causing the rise in global temperature accounted for fumes emissions. For instance, China is renowned as the most emitting country since the Chinese get used to utilizing coal on their regular basis.
On the other hand, the authorities should hold responsibility for increasing the demand for alternative resources usages. Firstly, it can ensure preservation efforts. As the matter of the fact, if the demand for renewable energy is boosted, the success of environmental protection can be achieved since the global warming caused by industrial activities trigger the rise in Earth’s temperature, leading to the disappearance of endangered animals. To illustrate, the polar bear is on the brink of extinction due to the ice melting in the artic, reducing its hunting areas and the number of its prey. Thus, the renewable one can contribute to the effort of conservation and mitigate the detrimental effects of human development.
In conclusion, I concur with this tendency since its merit could assert the sustainable development of eco-system by enhancing the preservation and minimizing the severe effects on the environment. Therefore, the government should urgently encourage the usage of environmentally friendly energy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62171052632 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15458811257 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0387393042 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124691588444 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374291497848 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410832325261 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733863204847 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369058455002 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.