Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?
Everyone needs friends because friendships play an important role in their life. However, it is also a complicated relationship. There are some qualities of a good friend and some reasons that deteriorate the good friendship from time to time.
A great friend has two most important qualities. The first quality is honesty which means that they do not lie and make friends without any purpose. A person who has an honest friend could share their thinking and interest with their buddies with no prudent. Therefore, they always enjoy their time together with their friends which contributes to a happy life. The second is that a good friend is a person who could support and give a hand whenever their friends are in trouble. With unconditionally supports and helps from friends, a person will be stronger and is likely to get over hardships. They will also feel a sense of united and love from other people.
However, a close friend relationship could be destroyed by some reasons. The lie is a contributor that makes friendship come to an end. A person who knows that their friends are not sincere will not willing to share what is on their mind and tell the truth with their friends. The prudent and unbelief could be resulted in breaking the relationship. Moreover, people who conflict in terms of opinions and characteristics will be unlikely to be best friends. It is because that they could come to arguments and can not find the solutions in everything. Therefore, they could not be together with each other for a long time and their relationship will be weaken and broken.
In conclusion, a good friend relationship could be extremely meaningful and take an important part of each person. Therefore, people should find good friends and keep good relationship with their friends.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94701986755 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75933333291 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470198675497 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5402566381 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6315789474 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231628828201 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836780934256 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534059045659 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159624822302 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584946719811 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.