Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?
Humans encounter myriad people in their life time and out of those only few resonate and match in their likes and dislikes. That small number of people then form a bond or relationship called friendship, but in a span of a life time several of these friends leave and many new bonds keep on getting formed in somewhat cyclic manner. Though people coming into our life and leaving is a continuous process, there are few individuals that stay and form a special bond that strengthens with each passing day. If we take a sample space of such long lasting relationships, then we can find profusion of characterstics common in all such friendships. And at same time there is a large corpora of common reasons that weakens a close relationship. Fiven below are few characterstics found in friendships that become stronger over time, and those which become complicated and then weakens.
Most crucial reason that buttresses a bond is honesty. Good friends never lie to each other, and they rather than lying or giving a euphimistic response, advice veraciously and bluntly whenever they feel need to do so. Another comparable characterstic of great friends is that they don't slander or calumnize another friend behind their back. Information in which something ill is being told about a person who is not around, somehow usually reaches that person and whenever that happens trust gets broken and is very hard to amend. This characterstic is never found in true friends and they rather defend friend who is getting defamed. Moreover, providing support in sickness and in health is another quality only found in great friends. They make time to meet, do fun activities together and help us whenever in need. Whenever the qualities are present in a relationship, then such friendships only get stronger with time.
Similarly, reasons that make friendships cumbersome over time lie in close vicinity with the reasons that make bonds stronger. Being unfaithful is at top of that list. Whenever, their is an intent on malice and a significant amount of dishonesty in a friendship then such relatioships are bound to fail. For instance - "friendship" between boss and an employee in an organisation is one of them where fawning nature of employee and his yes man kind of attitude becomes the reason for collapse of such bonds as soon as employee leaves organisation. Distancing themselves and not being in touch regularly is another reason that can loosen a relationship. Being in touch periodically ensures that bond is maintained and never weakens.
In conclusion, a very thin line lies between a friend who is great and friends who just get lost over course of time. Ensuring that degree of honesty is always maintained and finding time to be in touch can be two most important characterstic for a long lasting friendship.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...Humans encounter myriad people in their life time and out of those only few resonate and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...p called friendship, but in a span of a life time several of these friends leave and many...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife and leaving is a continuous process, there are few individuals that stay and ...
^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tionships, then we can find profusion of characterstics common in all such friend...
^^
Line 1, column 681, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'corpus'?
Suggestion: corpus
...hips. And at same time there is a large corpora of common reasons that weakens a close ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat become stronger over time, and those which become complicated and then weaken...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r, and they rather than lying or giving a euphimistic response, advice veraciousl...
^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...acterstic of great friends is that they dont slander or calumnize another friend beh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...thful is at top of that list. Whenever, their is an intent on malice and a significan...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... course of time. Ensuring that degree of honesty is always maintained and finding...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 470.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02340425532 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91781393277 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5672406001 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.318181818 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24011703212 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684541757897 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489705982171 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154699240999 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501694414381 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...Humans encounter myriad people in their life time and out of those only few resonate and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...p called friendship, but in a span of a life time several of these friends leave and many...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife and leaving is a continuous process, there are few individuals that stay and ...
^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tionships, then we can find profusion of characterstics common in all such friend...
^^
Line 1, column 681, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'corpus'?
Suggestion: corpus
...hips. And at same time there is a large corpora of common reasons that weakens a close ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat become stronger over time, and those which become complicated and then weaken...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r, and they rather than lying or giving a euphimistic response, advice veraciousl...
^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...acterstic of great friends is that they dont slander or calumnize another friend beh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...thful is at top of that list. Whenever, their is an intent on malice and a significan...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... course of time. Ensuring that degree of honesty is always maintained and finding...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 470.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02340425532 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91781393277 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5672406001 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.318181818 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24011703212 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684541757897 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489705982171 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154699240999 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501694414381 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.