Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone.

Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Projects and assignments are intrinsic parts of school curriculum and education institutes usually associate certain amount of marks for such activities in each semester. These tasks help students to grasp chunks of knowledge without a direct supervisiory guidance with aim to make cohorts of a class self-sufficient in conveying and expressing a new idea to someone. While some students are of opinions that projects should be individually allocated to them, others assert that such assignments should be given as a group task. In my opinion both sides have its own pros and cons.

Working alone can prevent chances of having a free loader in a project. Free loaders are certain student that participate bare minimum in the group assignments. Thus, chances of encountering individuals who benfit from effots of others get eliminated when a student individually completes a project. Additionally, flexibility of students to allocate time is higher since problems like mutual agreement over a time to meet, place to discuss and debate are no longer needed to be considered. Flexibility to work wherever and whenever students feel comfortable is another benefit of working alone. Moreover, it gives opportunity to learn a large branch of information on the assignment topic as students has no other people to divide portion of topic. This learning opportunity reduces to a significant amount in group project where individuals get chance to study only a portion of the topic.

On the other hand, focusing just on certain area of a given topic can make students learn about that portion in depth and group project can serve as an important way to achieve such goal. Other added benefit that comes from group projects is enhancement of orator and debate skills. Students in a group discuss the portions covered by them in common meetings through presentation and dicussion of chunks of individually learned areas, and these activities boosts abilities of students to explain and assert their viewpoint with full confidence. Group projects offer a very good opportunity for students to learn how to work in teams. Learning this skill from a young age can help them in future where most of the work is done usually in teams.

In conclusion, choosing a side in such topic is quite complex as both sides have their own benfits. Benefits of one can not be overshadowed by skills offered by others and proper mix of both kind of projects in school curriculum can ensure that students get best of both formats.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10462287105 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83129100594 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523114355231 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3108290845 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266348342911 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869515497703 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444257942442 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160961748533 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0077221981846 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.