The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University’s social media advertising campaign, organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Chart given below represent effects on number of applicants enrolling for Dolittle univerisity after social media advertising campaign was organised by taking into consideration applicants who live within 100km of univeristy and those who live further than 100km.
In general, social media advertisment campaign had positive effect within 100km of university's range as number of applicants in each age range increased after it. Whereas, advertisment campaign had somewhat mix result while considering applicants who live further than 100 km from university.
Number of applicants in 40+ age range saw most amount of increment when considering proximity of 100km. Applicants in this age group increased from approximately 10 to 50 after social media campaign. However, not much increment was seen in 40+ age range if we consider applicants who live further than 100km from university and only small increment of close to 10 applicants was observed.
Age range of 18-22 has contrasting result in both charts. Though the overall effect of social media advertisment was postive in both the charts, considerable amount of increment, close to 170 applicants, was seen in applicants who live further than 100km. Whereas the same age group saw a very small increase in number of applicants if we consider applicants who live with in 100km of university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s in each age range increased after it. Whereas, advertisment campaign had somewhat mix...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'mixed', 'mixt'.
Suggestion: mixed; mixt
...eas, advertisment campaign had somewhat mix result while considering applicants who...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42180094787 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94571781251 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488151658768 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6529866205 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.111111111 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341928235459 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176554662369 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730374788546 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252695135673 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366166262328 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.