The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University s social media advertising campaign organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university Summarize the information by select

Essay topics:

The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University’s social media advertising campaign, organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The above charts shows the number of applicants of a certain age group who have started living either within or more than 100km of Doolitle University. Also, both of these graphs have shown simultaneous comparison of the people the year before and after the university's social media campaign for those age groups.

As it can clearly be seen, after the campaign, the number of people living within 100km range of the university has increased for each age group. But there is some variance amongst the people living beyond 100km of the university for each age group shown.

By the next year of the campaign, we see that the highest increase for the number of people who are within 100km radius of the university is for the age demograph of 40 or more, with an increase of 40 people. In contrast to this, the number of people living beyond 100km of the university for age group 18 to 22 years , with the increase of 150 people seems grand.

Also, for the age demograph of 23 to 39 years old, we see a marginal dip from previous year for the people who live more than 100km away from the university.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The above charts shows the number of applicants of a certain a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... university for age group 18 to 22 years , with the increase of 150 people seems g...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57575757576 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33149583562 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.9413573284 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273887384128 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158009805889 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480216942843 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190461019885 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742404992047 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.