As our world marches to the future, technologies have become more and more ubiquitous which are involved in everything surrounding us. With a rising trend of driverless cars, some people assert that it could completely replace the existing position of traditional transportations, whereas their counterparts are still reluctant to use them since it may contain several drawbacks. As far as I am concerned, the merits of driverless vehicles overshadow its demerits.
Convincing arguments can be pointed out that non-driver vehicles are likely to be suitable in the modern hectic life nowadays. To start with, people transporting by automatic driving cars have more time to complete their tasks on the road. Many people complained that they had been having tremendous difficulties because of the delay of their jobs for driving. Thus, in other words, driverless cars have a tendency to enhance the productivity of workers since they could utilize their spare time to solve the business's emerging contract. Moreover, driverless transportations could improve the safety rate of commuting. Researchers supported this idea by calculating the number of car accidents in a year and revealed that more than 70% of those car trash were caused by human error. This, thus, reduces the tragedies on the road as well as assuring their users, especially with those who have a fear of driving.
It may be tempting to argue that the more optimistic about future innovation, the more severe the unemployment issues are. Taxi and bus drivers could no longer afford their lives due to the widespread use of robotics. But further analysis would make it clear that driverless vehicles create high demands on mechanisms and other car- repaired associated employment with more competitive salary ranges.
For my part, after considering the arguments above, I feel that adapting to vehicles that do not require a driver could be of tremendous benefit to humans in both their careers and health. Therefore, people have to widen their knowledge and experience in order to catch with the future shifts
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this car' or 'those cars'?
Suggestion: this car; those cars
...year and revealed that more than 70% of those car trash were caused by human error. This,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, i feel, as well as, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28012048193 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86661391244 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7301828133 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175235492996 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604440104263 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441919774813 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111109645982 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122984856548 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.