In ever-changing world, The advent of cutting-edge transport industry asscociated with greater demand for people's requirements and needs in many faucet of life, especially in means of transportation. There is often debate that All vehicles will be replaced by non-driver technology. Personally, I firmly believe that It has both disadvantages and advantages. I would outline my reasons in this essay.
To begin with, There has several reasons for people, especially in the opinion of city dwellers who think that driverless vehicles becomes a propensity. This mode of transportation will improve safety, efficiency and sustainability on the roads. To be specific, there would be less people on street during rush hours to wait for public transportation because driverless cars are able to carry them and use sensors, cameras, artificial intelligence to navigate the roads as well as avoid obstacles.Furthermore, non-driver vehicles can reduce errors that cause most of spontaneous risk and fatalities, such as speeding, distractions, fatigue or emotional damage. Also, this way of commuting combined with the latter-day tools can optimize fuel consumption and emissions by adjusting speed, better route and distance to traffic conditions and signals.
Those advantages are not to say that may outweigh the disadvantages.I firmly believe that it is temporary tendency instead of being permanent to meet the demand for drivers. Manufacturers, who have established this mean of transport can be responsible for technical, regulatory and social challenges. They must address some spontaneous risks in relation to infrastructure, construction and public acceptance. Also, the development of driverless car make a unfair competitiveness in commercial market as well as lead to the imbalance of economic growth in this day and age.
For those above-mentioned radical advantages, driverless vehicles can be considered as one of the most flexibility and convenience, but we can appear as some counterproductive issues, which become the primary factors in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun faucet seems to be countable; consider using: 'many faucets'.
Suggestion: many faucets
...d for peoples requirements and needs in many faucet of life, especially in means of transpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould outline my reasons in this essay. To begin with, There has several reasons...
^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e roads. To be specific, there would be less people on street during rush hours to w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...te the roads as well as avoid obstacles.Furthermore, non-driver vehicles can reduce errors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce to traffic conditions and signals. Those advantages are not to say that may...
^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...say that may outweigh the disadvantages.I firmly believe that it is temporary ten...
^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the development of driverless car make a unfair competitiveness in commercial ma...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f economic growth in this day and age. For those above-mentioned radical advant...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69155844156 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52167678394 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633116883117 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.1452446445 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.846153846 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230997110607 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735291560265 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677654029149 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134626801236 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258293470712 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.