In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries.
What are the positive or negative effects of this development?
Forecasts indicate that humanity should be expecting a rapidly growing size of the elderly population, surpassing that of the younger age groups. This would lead to two main concerns, rising government expenditure and lower economic growth.
To begin with, an aging population would see a significant rise in government expenditure. This is due to an increase in pensioners’ payments as well as expanded healthcare demand. To elaborate, as more people enter the retirement age, naturally, the government is expected to assist them with their expenses as they no longer go to work, thus, requiring more expenditure from a nation’s treasury. Similarly, as people grow older, their body will not always function as intended, therefore leading to more health issues, hence requiring more government health subsidies to cover the treatments of those emerging health concerns, again, putting strains on the government’s budget.
In addition to an amplified expenditure, lower economic growth may also accompany an aging nation. This is a direct consequence of a reduction in the size of a country’s labour force, as well as the shrinking investment utility rate of their budget spending. Firstly, as more and more workers retire, the production capacity of an economy contracts due to the thinning of the workforce, failing to generate any further Gross Domestic Production, ultimately rendering a drop in economic growth. Moreover, despite the government spending money to stimulate the economy, such funds are not being allocated into the investment of business activities, but rather, on daily expenses of old people. This leads to a plummeting ability to further expand an economy’s growth, therefore hampering its economic progress. Japan is a clear instance of this issue, where an aging population exerted an opposing pressure against its economic growth.
In conclusion, a close examination of the issue uncovered several concerns associated with an aging population. Those issues include but are not limited to government budget strains and weakening economic growth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5786163522 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99429200001 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9246125033 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790162469918 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274402080759 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245399643837 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469194945754 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310460700115 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.