Some believe that the best decision is to allocate more money to research about life on other planets, since the Earth will get too spoiled for the next generation to live on. I personally totally disagree with this notion and think that the money is better to be spent on the Earth itself, rather than taking the risk of moving to another planet.
On the one hand, Earth is becoming more densely populated day by day and the natural resources are limited. Thus people’s share of these resources will decline by overpopulation. In addition, the environmental degradation caused by previous generations is compounded and needs great effort to become resolved. Despite this, investing on other planets is not a reasonable solution, population control and environmental conservation are seemingly more feasible to be put into practice. Since by spending the same money on these two acts, rather than searching for a new home, more beneficial results would be reached.
On the other hand, moving to another planet is not only expensive, but also risky, and not as effective as expected. The appearance of the human race on the Earth, is evidence of the alignment of its features with the needs of the human body. Therefore, replacing the Earth with other planets, although studied thoroughly by researchers, may cause some harm to the human generation, as some factors might not be discussed by scholars. Besides, even if there would be no threats on the new planets, the human is the biggest threat itself. Because if we could not save our own planet, who guarantees we will not spoil the new one?!
To sum up, from my personal standpoint, the idea of increasing funds on the research for life on other planet is not acceptable, since despite its risk, it does not prevent the population from damaging the new planet. Thus, investigation of this money on population control and environmental conservation acts, would be much more effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02160493827 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79927722452 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5408267716 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304029789112 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991265883334 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626818264559 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188912291322 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732461211328 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.