Some governments argue that relocating business premises to rural areas might resolve the cities' traffic and housing issues. I personally believe that despite the benefits of this notion, some measures must be taken into practice to tackle its drawbacks.
On the one hand, relocation of firms and their employees to the countryside is advantageous for some reasons such as reducing traffic congestion and increasing the accessibility of affordable accommodation. Hence this act would result in more vacant houses and apartments in the area, followed by decreased purchasing and renting prices. Another seemingly apparent effect of this practice is the better air quality due to lower cars downtown, combined with less crowd in public centers, which would provide residents with higher living standards.
On the other hand, despite the advantages of the abovementioned idea for city dwellers, the businesses and workforces moved, might be subject to numerous difficulties. First of all, as the city population is the key driver to most sales, they would lose a considerable share of their market. Furthermore, the lack of facilities in rural areas does not offer them the same convenience as they used to have in urban areas. Therefore, a higher rate of commutes would be triggered by their trips to the city center, producing more traffic and pollution due to longer distances.
In conclusion, from my standpoint, despite the benefits of such relocation practices for city dwellers, some challenges might arise for the people who move to the countryside, like lack of access to the same facilities as city residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...essibility of affordable accommodation. Hence this act would result in more vacant ho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3515625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93432965553 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0129978882 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172790594851 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657219995796 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302483108873 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100065177236 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260925978688 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.