Technology brought profound changes in teaching field.it is argued that giving online lectures to students is the best way than giving auditorium lectures to a large number of people. From my perspective I completely disagree with the given statement. Auditorium lectures enhance the interaction between students and professors also to find competitors in their field of study.
Auditorium classes helps the students to interact with lectures and colleges. A good bonding between pupils and professors helps the students to grasp more knowledge in their own fields of education. This helps the students to solve their doubts in their own field. For example, by conduction jam sessions, debates enriches the students command on their specific subjects. It is an advantageous for students who are having less communication skills and helps them to interact easily. For example, in school of technology in U.K. allows students to ask doubts to lectures after the completion of seminar .there are few more benefits on giving auditorium lectures.
Students by participating in auditorium classes helps them to find friends with familiar thoughts. By this the concept of competition comes into play that makes the students to study actively and score well in their studies. This leads to the welfare of the pupil. Few universities conduct the seminars for students in projects and forces them to give seminars on their respective projects that helps the students to get free from stages fear. These types of activities are impossible in online education.
To conclude that auditorium lectures benefits students in different ways. Students can enrich their communication skills and becomes Prominent in their study by participating in auditorium classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... way than giving auditorium lectures to a large number of people. From my perspective I completel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd competitors in their field of study. Auditorium classes helps the students to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lectures after the completion of seminar .there are few more benefits on giving au...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48339483395 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85488213123 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505535055351 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7133889284 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221783064465 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809543413991 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720701560106 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154221121359 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705769614289 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.