The government’s investment in arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Government should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Art helps showcase our creativity and identity to the mass. Despite this, many people point out that investment in arts, music, and theater is a misuse of cash and governments ought to put these assets in public services. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the notion, and in this essay, I will support my views with examples.
There are several reasons why I disagree with the idea. Firstly, the investments in arts is gainful for the nation since they are economic drivers. The demand for an inventive workforce is generally high in the business world, however, there is a short supply of art graduates. If the money spent on improving art schools, it will increase creative graduates. Joblessness and school dropouts will diminish if there is a rise in creative industries, so they can secure jobs on their passion in the future. Moreover, arts, music and theatre help preserve our cultural identity and enables us to pass it down to future generations. Additionally, arts help exhibit the world that of our cultural background and advance cultural tourism. Governments earn tax revenue from tourism and this can help improve living standards in the long-term.
On the other hand, some assert that money should be funded to public services. They feel that arts don’t give advantages to an individual like the advancement in education or healthcare. Advances in healthcare and education helps create a healthy and educated workforce. Despite this, they neglect the fact that public funding can often be small, resulting in public service mismanagement.
In conclusion, from my point of view, funding for arts is essential for the development of a country. Not only does it promote cultural tourism, but it expands industries and allow people to follow their dreams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16151202749 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75588091306 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.001217453 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3529411765 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19922237848 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560913380421 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657308045233 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115197293099 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695331750663 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.