Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, similar products can be brought anywhere in the world, and as a result, countries are becoming more like each other. Social media and affordable shipping costs are major contributors to globalization. Some people point out that it is a positive development for countries while others argue that it is a negative development. In my opinion, it has several negative impacts and I will express my view with examples.
There are several reasons why I believe there are several disadvantages of having similar products. Firstly, it erases our cultural identity. This is because products being sold on a global scale must have the appeal to attract everyone. For example, there is a decline in the popularity of traditional food because oversea consumers may not enjoy it. Moreover, it discourages local businesses from making profit. This has a negative impact on the growth of our economy and causes less employment since many people are consuming oversea products. Additionally, it impacts our climate. Since transportation being improved, and shipping costs being reduced, having products delivered transnationally would bring an increase in air and water pollution. Therefore, there is an increase in harmful oxides damages both our health and the environment.
On the other hand, there are some people who assert that a positive development in our economies. They feel that it helps economies specialize in what they are best at. Countries only produce products that are cost-effective resulting in less failures. It also optimizes competition and helps companies innovate new. Despite this, there is a less variety of products in the market and it must be imported from other countries.
In conclusion, from my viewpoint, countries becoming more alike have negative developments. It has several factors contributing to pollution and sustainability of culture in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun failures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ts that are cost-effective resulting in less failures. It also optimizes competition...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47278911565 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04648758151 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8209657791 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.45 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248996708886 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617796361027 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783564208272 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154293096161 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682072889775 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.