It is clear that governments should invest in infrastructural projects. Although some people believe that more money should be spent on railways than on roads, I partly disagree with this opinion, as the amount of invested money will vary depending on a particular situation.
With regards to the trains, governments should invest more in them when distances between big cities are large. This is because this means of transport becomes cheaper than others as distance rises. For example, a car which travels from Moscow to Vladivostok will consume much more energy than a train, which will result in higher costs. Moreover, the same distance will be covered faster by railway, as the average train’s speed may exceed 200 km per hour for the prolonged period of time without the necessity to stop for a night.
On the other hand, cars are preferred when everything is closely located and frequently used, as governments should also consider economic aspects when making their investment decisions. For instance, in Europe, it is logical to actively develop roadways, while in Siberia it may not be profitable due to the low usage rate. If a government does not consider such aspects, then people might rebel against ineffective budget use. Additionally, when everything is relatively close, it is much easier to make repairs or, at least, to check different sections of a road.
To conclude, I partly disagree with the statement that more money should be invested in railways rather than roads. In my opinion, both these projects are significant, and their relative importance depends on such factors as the distance between big cities and the frequency of project’s use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...xceed 200 km per hour for the prolonged period of time without the necessity to stop for a nig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, at least, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1897810219 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77812750505 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5045749172 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190945222358 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775002123934 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100215663432 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137587140517 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878381514284 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.