Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that governors have to allocate more budget for expanding railways than roads. I strongly agree with the point of view as societies can benefit from reducing traffic congestion as well as air pollution in their habitants.
First of all, spending money on rail ways can alleviate traffic jams in cities which have this problem. This is because of the improvements of public transportation which is a significant impact of expanded railways. Although many people prefer driving their own cars than use public transportation, a good and developed public transport system can encourage them to use it more. So, the number of cars in streets and roads would be decreased and the possibility of traffic jams will be diminished. To illustrate it, despite the huge number of people who travel daily between Tehran and Karaj, traffic congestion in the roads has been reduced since the railways between these two cities was expanded, however in the past these people used to lose their time in extreme traffic congestions.
Moreover, reducing air pollution is another major benefit from expanding railways schemes as it can lead to better public transportation and less cars in streets. the less cars people use, the less greenhouse gases can be produced. Since it is said by experts that decrease in the amount of produced greenhouse gases from cars is the key point for tackling air pollution problem, any plan which leads to decline the usage of cars such as expanded railways instead of roads can be really beneficial.
In conclusion, spending money on railways by governments is a perfect attitude which has significant impacts on improving public transportation and can lead to tackle the problem of traffic congestion and air pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ead to better public transportation and less cars in streets. the less cars people u...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ransportation and less cars in streets. the less cars people use, the less greenhou...
^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...portation and less cars in streets. the less cars people use, the less greenhouse ga...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13588850174 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8034644868 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2911850125 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110534143569 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465952917871 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370599135003 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826887843902 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331033604499 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.