Government should support prevention of the disease and lifestyle change rather than treatment of those who are ill.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is increasingly important to consider how the government manage its resources. While others believe that it should fund the treatment of a disease, I argue with the opinion of others that most of the spending should be poured in disease prevention and healthy lifestyle.
To begin with, the government’s support in the prevention of an illness will benefit all people in the society. It will be best for the authorities to spend money on an appropriate health awareness programs that will encourage the people to live healthily and empowers them to participate in the community programs that will be focus on how to avoid certain chronic disease. For example, an inspiring health campaign in the United Kingdom entitled “A fruit in a day” reduced the growth of the people suffering from Diabetes by approximately 10%. This is a clear evidence that the government can effectively prohibit the occurrence of a disease by merely implementing an efficient program.
Furthermore, the cost of preventing a disease will provide less strain to the government expenditure. This is due to the fact that the treatment of a disease is usually costly compared to the advertising campaign for its prevention. For instance, a recent study on the state budget of Queensland Australia in 2015 proved that the ratio of expenses on hospital treatment versus awareness campaign is nearly 4:1. This shows that the government can allocate more funds to other social services if they can save more money through increasingly health awareness programs.
In conclusion, although the government should maintain the health of its people, I believe that it is a better option if most of the fund allocation for health will be directed to an awareness program. It is highly recommended that this should be taken seriously to avoid a future damaging effect of people’s wellness.
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272997032641 0.247107183377 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.127596439169 0.155533422707 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0712166172107 0.0946595960268 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0326409495549 0.0501214627716 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0356083086053 0.0437548338989 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142433234421 0.122226691241 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0237388724036 0.0403226058552 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01285246987 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0356083086053 0.0326793684256 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.13649851632 0.0861772015684 158% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0385756676558 0.021408717616 180% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0118694362018 0.011925033212 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1879.0 1933.35771543 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 316.048096192 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20132013201 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.422442244224 0.374742101984 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316831683168 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250825082508 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161716171617 0.137316102897 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01285246987 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.037074148 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511551155116 0.56093040696 91% => OK
Word variations: 51.5081739055 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 25.25 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0459126484 49.517814964 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.583333333 127.492653851 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.814263465372 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 56.9331683168 49.1944974215 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.24242424242 1.69124875643 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255895570597 0.332605444948 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151604711965 0.102741220458 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0584064057277 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.633047819429 0.534860350844 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126820088224 0.148594505496 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138563766496 0.134430193775 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756208576454 0.0742795772207 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.448820047073 0.324371583561 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0626296415602 0.0638462369009 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209915225528 0.228012699653 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577301003193 0.058150111329 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.