Governments should make more effort to promote alternative energy sources of energy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is argued by some that the government should take more initiative in the promotion of alternative energy sources such as those that are renewable. I completely agree with the aforementioned statement, as I personally believe that the government is the authorized body to advocate the utilization of sustainable energy sources.
It is by no means certain that the massive surge in the number of energy consumers, in turn, increases the demand in energy consumption, thus limiting if not totally disappearing the availability of the primary energy sources that are currently in use such as fossil fuels. The forming of fossil fuels like petroleum, coal and natural gas takes millions of years, which means their present supplies can be depleted just before the new ones can be readily available, thus, risking them to be no longer accessible if the needs continued to rise. In addition, the burning of fossil fuels produces large amounts of carbon dioxide, which causes a serious environmental concern known as global warming. Having that said, the government should advocate more to promote the utilization of alternative energy sources over the non- renewable ones to be able to meet the increasing energy consumption demands and to help reduce the global greenhouse gas emissions, to save mother earth.
To further elaborate, the government has the capability to fund researches on how to wisely and feasibly utilize available renewable energy sources that are not environmentally harmful such as wind, solar and water power. To illustrate, various researches in the Philippines came up with the conclusion that the country’s location, being near the Asia-Pacific monsoon belt, makes it an ideal site for installing wind turbines, therefore, the government in partnership with some non-government organization s, funded the installation of wind turbines in some part of Northern Luzon, particularly Ilocos Region. Moreover, the government can also create a partnership with businessmen to provide big discounts for companies, households or individuals who desire to purchase solar panels for the utilization of solar power during the daytime, thereby, decreasing the consumption of fossil fuels. Furthermore, the government has the authority to sanction individuals who irresponsibly polluting bodies of water, thus, preserving the water for electricity consumption through the use of hydropower.
In conclusion, the government has to make more effort to promote patronization of environmentally friendly energy sources to be able to meet the increasing energy demands without totally consuming the primary energy sources, thereby saving them for future generation use and thereby saving mother earth. Nevertheless, it can be made more possible when the governing body will work in partnership with every individual, who are actually the major consumers of energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs continued" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'continuing' or 'to be continued'.
Suggestion: continuing; to be continued
...to be no longer accessible if the needs continued to rise. In addition, the burning of fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as wind, solar and water power. To illustrate, various researches in the Ph...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llation of wind turbines in some part of Northern Luzon, particularly Ilocos Regi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57175398633 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14097484679 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535307517084 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0052325928 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.833333333 106.682146367 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5833333333 20.7667163134 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251218997954 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10277066256 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925824137793 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181957498876 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784577371064 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.0946893788 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.02 50.2224549098 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.