Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In the limitation of budget, governments who want to build a transportation system sometimes have to choose whether railroads they have to build first or roads. Regards to these options, I do agree that if the governments spend more budgets on railroads rather than roads. I have several reasons why I agree with this statement.
The first, a train on the railroads can carry more passengers than a bus on the roads. In railway carriage, it can bring 50 up to 75 passengers in one way. If a locomotive can takes 10 railway carriages, it can take 500 – 750 passengers in one way. Compared with a bus, it only can bring 50 passengers in one way. Therefore, transport using railroads more efficient than roads. The second, railways is a long term investment. For example railroads in Jakarta which connected it with the city around Jakarta, such as Bekasi, Bogor, and Serpong. These railroads have been built since Netherland governs in Indonesia. These railroads are still useful and bring millions of people in a day until now.
The last, building the railroads means support environmental issue in reducing air pollution. Nowadays air pollution becomes a global concern. Therefore, every country in this world has to make a concrete movement to support this campaign. The railroads and an electric train can become a good solution for this issue.
In conclusion, the governments who have not enough budgets better to spend it to build the railroads because it is more efficient, durable and can support the go green issue. Nevertheless, it is still the best if a government have more than enough money on their budget could build both railroads and roads simultaneously.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98576512456 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83790369726 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3219486071 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8333333333 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195962740738 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686259699567 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072743129744 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126635244659 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811204260749 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.