Governments should spend money on railways rather than on roads.
To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Transportation is undoubtedly matter of huge importance in modern days. One of the heated debate on this field lies in the question: Should governments invest on railways or roads. While many in favor of rail systems, I firmly believe that money spent on railways could be a loss in national budget, on the grounds of some following reasons.
On the one hand, rail networks triggers enormous drawbacks in terms of users and authorities. Firstly, it is irrefutable that railways are specified by an only vehicle – train, from which the lack of flexibility stems. Rail systems consequently, are unable to meet the demands of all inhabitants. To illustrate, train stations can not be reached immediately in emergency cases. Secondly, considering difficulties in construction namely geographic barriers, rail networks are obvious waste of money. Specifically, the unpopularity of railways even exacerbates the situation.
On the other hand, road investigation is more beneficial in reference to its advantages over railways. Admittedly, street transportation enables the flow of various vehicles, contradicts to the sole train on railways. Not only does this facilitate the development in national economy but also boost profits for non-government companies that manufacture vehicles. Furthermore, the spread of roads serves as constant supply for means of transportation. This is synonymous to easy access to almost all residential and community buildings within a city.
To recapitulate, spending money on roads brings greater bargain than on rail networks, according to the aforementioned arguments. As a result, government should take further consideration into this issue, for the sake of the citizens and the country itself.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61832061069 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30595167439 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660305343511 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4432579478 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139481997123 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377997515202 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502085923684 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882067745599 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566635971125 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.