The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates how many requests to enter a city received by the Tourist Information Office in six months, categorized by three forms of enquiries.
Overall, it is outstanding that only the requests made by letter or mail went down throughout the course, which opposed to the trends of the other kinds.
Starting with the record of well under 800 letters and emails, this figure gradually decreased in the first two months of the year. After that, a remarkable declined was witnessed from March to May, changed the number to almost half of the beginning point.
Of the remained categories, the telephone requests number was more varied. Standing at 800 as a result of a slight fall in January, it then climbed up steadily and gain 2000 more in March. On the other hand, the number of in-person requests had experienced the same figure, though started at roughly 400. From the third month of the year, both kinds of enquiries went up in number, however, there were more people (around 2000) preferred to come in person for access to the city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: up
... the year, both kinds of enquiries went up in number, however, there were more people around...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, then, third, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84153005464 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48151215892 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677595628415 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9976561584 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125674086586 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487955716901 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653072643934 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765018889946 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818636467601 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.