Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The development of transport infracstucture is considered one of the most controversial issues for the government. While some people believe the budget should be allocated to trains, others argue that roadways are the better option to broaden the transport of an area. In my view, both rails and roads can provide advantages that worth the authorities looking at depend on many factors.
On the one hand, investing in a railway system, especially hi-tech systems, can carry passengers and cargo to different locations faster thanks to the higher speed travel and less congestions compare to the private vehicles. Therefore, citizens can save time and concentrate on their jobs, which eventually improve their life. Another explanation for this notion is the amount of carbon emission from this transportation is much lower than cars or bikes. For example, in Japan, the high-speed rail systems use electricity to power the bullet trains, so no air pollution is created. Lastly, many researches show that the number of road accidents is much higher compare to rail casualties, so trains are safer than cars.
On the other hand, the beneficial impacts that private vehicles provided are undeniable. Most prominently, they are considered the easiest and most convenient method of transportations. Also, they can reach almost everywhere and connect facilities that people need such as shopping centers, hospitals, and education institutions. Furthermore, while the budget that authorities have to spend to improve the trains systems is enormous, this number of roads is a lot cheaper, so governments can save the railway cost for other important purposes.
In conclusion, there is no doubt to say that railways systems bring huge positive effects for a country, but road transports are also a worthy investment that government should consider. So, the decision whether rails or roads should be chosen carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun congestions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r thanks to the higher speed travel and less congestions compare to the private vehi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39799331104 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93507940452 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2516574116 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134097585358 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428235404082 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484693303121 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086276264986 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394895677957 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.