With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.
With the increase in population and the advent of modern technology, the demand for oil and gas is increasing day by day. This increase in demand might lead us to think that we should search for other sources of oil and gas which are still undiscovered. But since the earth is already in a vulnerable condition, the consequence of it would be devastating, which cannot be accepted.
The population of the world is growing in accelerated rate, so is the demand for fossil fuels. But again, fossil fuels are responsible for the greenhouse effect that the earth is going through for a while. This leads to global warming and many other destructive consequences. Also by digging out oil and gas can affect the overall balance of the earth in many ways. According to researchers, even if carbon emission is kept at a constant rate, it won’t be enough to prevent global warming and other corresponding consequences. At this moment, responding to the increased demand for oil and gas by searching for them in areas that are not yet opened up will be to sign a death warrant for the planet that is our home.
To satisfy the demand for fossil fuel we have to turn our attention to renewable energy like wind, tidal, solar power etc. These are the most viable options to meet the current demand for fuel without any negative effect to the earth. To succeed, more money should be invested into research regarding the use of renewable energy. Also, the existing technologies which are reliable on fossil fuel should be modified for using renewable energy as their major energy source.
So to conclude, it is not plausible to use more of the earth’s fossil fuel resources any more. The best option we have is to turn towards renewable energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nd many other destructive consequences. Also by digging out oil and gas can affect t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79139072848 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66965668117 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7947150214 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269170204252 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863811444848 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694443491951 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154365243264 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801883869357 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.