An increasing number of people are now using dating sites to meet their second halves. Do you think that this tendency helps people to socialize or does more harm than good?
Give your opinion. Provide relevant examples if necessary.
Nowadays more and more people begin relationships on social media or dating sites. In my opinion, I agree that online dating is a welcome development and it tends to help people to socialize. However, I also believe that dating online provides individuals with access to many more potential partners than they could often find in their daily lives.
Online dating offers a number of ways to get to know each other before meeting in person. Such computer-mediated communication allows for safe and convenient interaction without much risk. For many shy, self-conscious and anti-social people it is an excellent way to strike up a healthy relationship without fear of being rejected or ridiculed. For example, a 2019 psychological study found that many Ukrainian online daters confirmed that for them online dating is the best solution for an initial connection with their potential second halves.
In addition, meeting someone online equips individuals with quick access to a vast amount of possible dating partners from the virtual world. This is especially beneficial for people interested in partners of a particular type, orientation, lifestyle, or in isolated areas. Despite the fact that some people can get stuck endlessly looking for the perfect partner, many others, for instance, narrow their search to a small location, a certain set of "must have" features and talk to those who make this list.
In conclusion, the use of social media as way to begin to know someone better can help people to overcome shyness and be self-confident. It also helps to minimize a risk of being refused and protect own mental health. Moreover, well manageable wide choose of potential partners gives the opportunity to online dating users to find the most compatible one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25263157895 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90997583703 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6168763539 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215030463799 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807105965753 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490174798656 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135961546716 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547178480258 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.