Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. Do you agree or disagree? Any other measures do you think might be effective?
Currently, there are some people argue that the ideal method to relieve traffic pressure and air contamination is to raise oil price. From my perspective, I oppose this viewpoint, as it is not an effective method to address such problems.
There is no doubt that the private vehicle is the main factor to cause traffic and air pollution. However, the increased oil price is less likely to limit the number of motor vehicles on the road. Because such method will also raise the public transportation expense, such as bus and ferry. As a result, it will be unpopular with those who travel such transports.
Fortunately, there are various effective ways to solve these issues. First of all, it is the railway system that requires to be invested with more funds. There is an increasing number of commuters living rural areas. If governments build more railroads between such areas and urban areas, it will significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, which means the air quality will be improved. In addition, the bus services should be added, as it can obviously decrease the number of automobiles at peak hours. For example, in Auckland local residents used to drive to go to work since there were few bus services. By contrast, based on the latest report from Auckland City Council after adding more bus schedules the traffic congestions have been reduced greatly. Another point always raised is that governments should cut tax to promote the green energy cars, like Tesla. Because such car is zero emission and eco-friendly car. Therefore, if customers can accept these cars, it will be a wise option to decrease atmosphere pollution.
To conclude, as can be seen that just simply raised the fuel price cannot tackle the traffic jam and air pollution. Instead, there are plenty of actions that we can take to solve them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01633986928 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61416665804 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7094988343 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2777777778 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111988486667 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036397304255 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031631377247 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728277822412 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104904891167 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.