Pollution is the major concern that every country faces in this contemporary era. Many suggest that the best way to curb the expanding traffic is to increase the price of fuels, whereas others disagree that there are other ways to reduce the traffic and pollution. Although, I completely agree that increasing the cost of fuels would definitely arrest the growing traffic and pollution, still I would suggest some other measures too in this essay.
To commence with, let us discuss about the impact of increasing fuel prices on traffic. First of all, the primary reason for increase in traffic around the globe is individuals’ mentality of not preferring public transportations. As everybody prefers their privacy over the global issue, these people use private cars for commuting; thereby increasing pollution and traffic. If the prices of fuels are increased, fearing their expenses, these people would prefer to travel by public transportation, and hence there would be a greater reduction in traffic and pollution.
Though the above said measure could help in reducing the pollution to some extent, decreasing fares of public transportation and reducing taxes on battery-vehicles could be other plausible solutions. People would prefer to travel in public transport systems like railways and buses, if the prices are reduced with respect to the quality of service they provide. In India, for instance, most people do not prefer buses because the fare is not worth the quality of service they provide. In addition to this, if the government reduces taxes on battery-operated cars, many people would prefer to own these no -emission cars. Once people buy these cars, the government could slowly reduce the manufacturing of petrol and diesel cars; thereby saving the future world.
In conclusion, increasing the fuel costs would certainly reduce the pollution in atmosphere and in addition to this, if government decreases public transportation fares and reduces taxes on battery cars, they can decrease the pollution to the utmost level.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, still, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34984520124 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84230423499 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523219814241 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7599861381 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.923076923 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177662639823 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701192358959 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593447014572 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115075867356 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687688270227 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.