In today’s society, transportation and pollution issues are becoming more serious, it is argued that climbing the cost of fuels is the best solution to tackle this circumstance. In my point of view, I disagree with this solution, I believe that we can decrease the transportation and pollution issues by commuting public vehicles, besides that, the government should implement strategies that enhance infrastructure traffic.
To begin with, the chief cause the jumping vehicles and pollution issues is due to citizen are commuting their private transport. Rising the costs of fuels is just a temporary solution to address it, this way just make the vehicles go down a bit but not massively. Besides that, it is the way which hinder the transport of goods in essentially commercial field. Furthermore, citizen who are affected in a direct way related to their expenditure, cause a loss in their income. That is hence the climbing the cost of fuels is not the best choice to address this issue.
To tackle this issue in sufficient way, the government should have a roadmap to upgrade recent traffic works and encourage citizen using public transport instead of private ones to decline considerably the number of vehicles. Besides that, enacting some policies to trick the using personal transport by replacing with public ones to cope with pressing environment issues.
In conclusion,With numerous arguments provided, I strongly believe that raising gasoline prices is never the greatest way to limit the growing number of automobiles and pollution problems. The most prudent solution is to switch to public transportation and invest in traffic infrastructure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion issues by commuting public vehicles, besides that, the government should impl...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vehicles and pollution issues is due to citizen are commuting their private tran...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a direct way" with adverb for "direct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Furthermore, citizen who are affected in a direct way related to their expenditure, cause a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , With
...ng environment issues. In conclusion,With numerous arguments provided, I strongly...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, so, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34980988593 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00295507136 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532319391635 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7013619065 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0856149930553 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358491215032 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221932937153 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593341379737 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249589164945 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.