Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The urgency of environmental protection has truly hit home over the past few decades since we saw a vast variety of either marine pollution or “Amazon desert”. The issue of whether individuals are not able to contribute to save the earth along with governments and large corporations remains a subject of intense debate. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the idea mentioned above.
There are three main reasons why it takes all the community to tango when it comes to protecting nature. First of all, the government is by no means capable of mitigating the matter of contaminated ecosystem without us, tax payers. To his this one on the head, national budget is allocated to run multiple reforestation programmes as well as ameliorating natural habitat owing to taxes paid annually. Secondly, it is completely pragmatic for the public to have ample far-reaching impacts on the earth by replacing natural resources with sustainable and environmentally friendly energy ones. An illustration here is the growing establishment of solar power system in household, which has recently become a tendency in developing and developed countries.
Finally, yet, it cannot be argued that huge companies are prominent factors in environmental preservation. They predominantly focus on minimizing the damage caused by their own industrial activities, from restricting exhaust fumes to relieving relatively high proportion of hazardous substances dumped into the sea. Only by turning to use public transportation or relegating plastic bags will local people make a corresponding difference, however. All in all, it can be concluded that the ecosystem is being improved tremendously by every single part of the society.
For these reasons, it is my personal belief that regardless of who we are, normal citizens or politicians, we always play an equal role in the pressing problem of environmental pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44107744108 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25569204013 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.710437710438 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3595172434 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120670795175 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347944070367 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325337718598 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591064981201 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392674753464 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.