Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the environment is facing a huge threat in daily routine. Some believe that certain practices made by individuals are useless whereas, governments and MNC will be making a difference. This essay will state why I disagree and will discuss how individual efforts will contribute to the matter. To begin with, service starts from mankind. A small effort can make a huge impact. Individuals can promote new habits in educating their friends and families about practices that can help to save the environment. Governments can still spread awareness about the recent issue that is being faced but, still, it lies in the hands of one to implement it. A recent survey states, activities that are promoted by government and private organizations are not communicated effectively and has less than 25 percent of followers. On the other hand, Individuals develop the habit of following friendly practices to preserve the environment. They also have set an example to others by explaining what difference can be made when everyone adapts to that practice. For example, many have started to carry cloth bags to shops to avoid plastic bags which is non-biodegradable and has eventually led to lesser production. Companies can help by planting trees around its premises and by providing contracted buses for their employees. From the above, it can be seen that individuals can set the start for an impact in order to preserve the environment. Though companies can also make efforts it still lies on the hands of one to adapt to the practice and make difference. This essay has discussed how individuals could set an example and why I disagree with the above idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 895, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practices preserving'.
Suggestion: practices preserving
...develop the habit of following friendly practices to preserve the environment. They also have set an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05474452555 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88349116265 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0310338605 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249781406219 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845082875674 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634283036422 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249781406219 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.