Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Environmental degradation, which means the destruction of the environment by manmade activities has become a heavy threat in today’s world. The idea that only governments and multi-national organizations can help to improve the environment is still controversial whereas, individuals can also contribute towards this aspect. In my opinion, individuals can help with the betterment of the environment.
When it comes to huge organization or rather a government, they constitute a group of people who work there and still the concern of the individuals in beginning the relevant measures for helping the environment. Once, human being implements a change, it would give inspiration for others thus, setting an initial step of a massive difference. For example, the paper is produced by cutting down millions of trees every year, if one person chooses to save one sheet of paper a day it would create a massive difference by saving thousands of trees every day and promotes afforestation.
On the other hand, organizations can spread awareness among their employees and could offer suggestive measures such as using public transport, providing tree saplings and so on. When Individuals begin to follow certain practice like avoiding materials that highly disturb the environment, it could make a positive impact by motivating others. For example, they can avoid purchasing plastic bags while shopping, which is non-biodegradable and contaminates the soil, instead can carry cloth bags when going to stores.
In my opinion, I disagree that only organizations can make a huge difference in preserving the environment but also it is the people's responsibility to preserve the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ving the environment but also it is the peoples responsibility to preserve the environm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, whereas, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50384615385 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31018466029 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5587828773 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.1 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188561692641 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768467791107 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464969285186 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116171845729 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033056981176 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.