The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of other languages spoken at one university by British students during the year 2000 and 2010. On a glance of the given chat, for the year 2000 and 2010 Spanish contribute to 1/3 of the total speakers followed by another language accounting to 20 % in 2010 and 15% in 2000. German language is the least spoken language in both the years accounting to 10 % of the total.
On comparison of the given charts, Spanish still remained as the highest spoken language at 35% and has increased by 5% comparing to the year 2000 and still remains at its peak. Similarly, another language and two other language also increased by 5% to 20% and 15% respectively. French language has fallen to 10% during 2010 from 15% during 2000. No other language has decreased by half during the year 2010. German still remains constant at 10% during both the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...students during the year 2000 and 2010. On a glance of the given chat, for the yea...
^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts peak. Similarly, another language and two other language also increased by 5% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72903225806 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52632695499 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.409690529 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241984684629 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127363562259 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899735637182 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210938423982 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499937781415 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.