Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is an extended belief that individuals can do nothing to save the planet and that they are the governments and large companies who must take responsibility and look out the environment. However, despite agreeing with the fact that bigger powers can execute stronger actions, I think that every person is capable to impact their surroundings.
To start, big changes are made of the sum of a lot of small changes. For example, a sole commuter deciding to take the train instead of the car can be not significant in comparison with thousands of people driving to work. Nonetheless, it becomes a large amount of emissions reduced when we consider the total of drivers refusing to use their own vehicle, moreover a personal achievement when we calculate the total hours of transport during a whole year.
Individual inputs generate major outcomes when we study smaller areas. Instead of worrying about such global problems as farmhouse effect, we can focus on taking care of our local flora, for example. As a case of study, we can spot every global environmental issue that threatens Iceland musk, such as CO2 emissions, etc. But a single person can do a lot to save that protected plant, like not camping, driving or stepping over.
Still, it is true that good policies no matter if they come from the countries’ government or from conscious corporations, are the greatest to lead the change. They not only have the economic means to do so, but sometimes are the major cause of environmental destruction.
In any case, people must get empowered with their decision capability and make sensible choices on which parties they vote or brands they consume, and therefore they support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 47
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and real life examples. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...lead the change. They not only have the economic means to do so, but sometimes are the m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, such as, in any case, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80275949733 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632508833922 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0721053229 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196941653703 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672426204956 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537857685436 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101363183634 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577065383744 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.