International tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism.
International tourism is a bridge that connects two nations in terms of culture, moral as well as other things. Whereas, in recent years it has been seen in developing countries as a problematic thing that cause many issues for a few reasons. Some would claim that this issue will solve itself by the flow of time, however, from my perspective, there are much can be done to address this problem constructively.
As far as I am concerned, developing countries tend to follow this opinion rather than developed countries. Since, developing countries is easier to manage due to their poor financial condition, and weak political force, developed countries such as USA and Russia are inclined to rule less-fortunate regions to obtain a wealth and affluence. The spectacular example, Mexico, has been suffering from the international tourism, which have a negative impact to their country. Initially,among the people marijuana and other kind of drugs was permeated by tourists who disguised themselves as a tourist. Furthermore, Mexicans addicted to drugs and tend to ignore their work, family, and other essential things in order to get a satisfaction from marijuana. Prostitution, theft, robbery occurrences had been developing had been increasing in last decades. Moreover, ever since this coincidence, citizens having been seen the international tourism as threat they face.
On the other hand, as coin has two sides there is a solution to this problem. Nowadays, the use of social networking system has been increasing, simultaneously, the allocation of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter has been been spreading among the people. Therefore, in order to deal with this issue we should boost the internet brochure of the advantages of international travelling, or a video and photo that glance at the beneficial sides of accepting the tourists who are wiling to wander their country.
By way of conclusion, some people have a negative attitude towards international tourism, because of their past experience. Nonetheless, there is a method to tackle with this as I mentioned above. It may seem insurmountable in next few years, it is obvious thing that with the help of decent solution and way we could change this cross tendency towards tourism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 483, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , among
...ative impact to their country. Initially,among the people marijuana and other kind of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: been
...of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter has been been spreading among the people. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...international tourism, because of their past experience. Nonetheless, there is a method to tack...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27932960894 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08778383933 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583798882682 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4856615403 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27823101316 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863943569002 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808139869476 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16987305729 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067198914314 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.