Science tells us about the activities which are good for our health and others which are bad. Millions of people all over the world knows this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is and what can be done to change it?
Scientific researches clearly states the discrepancy between appropriate and inappropriate food for own health. In addition, mankind knows the threat of convenience food and still consume consume due to many factors.
Some would argue that this situation will correct itself by the flow of time. In my view, however, there is much that can be done to address the issue constructively.
First of all, people who live autonomous from their family are inclined to allocate convenient or fast foods. Due to their indolence, single-income households are likely to consume junk foods. In other words, they consider their expenditure on less costs fast foods as a wise choice. For instance, in extensive countries, such as USA most people eat hamburgers, pizzas and other junk foods during their lunch time. As a result, however, if you consume fast foods everyday the sum of money you have spent will be above your intention and expectation.
On the other hand, office workers are unlikely to eat qualitative food. Most of their time concentrated on current task, regardless they have eaten or not. As a consequence, their health will be threaten by serious diseases relied on half sophisticated products.
Despite all of this problems which have caused by fast food, there are also possible solutions to deal with the issue. One of the chief solutions is make the prohibition of convenient food places which are being constructed without the authority permission. Governments should ban the small branches of large fast food companies, such as KFC, McDonalds and other more. In other words, they should just build the largest branches in the inner-city and ban other convenient food places.
By way of conclusion, convenient food allocation which are hazardous to our health are likely to increase. In spite of this demographic trend, we can limit the distribution of this kind of food. It is inevitable that tackle with this kind of problems have been insurmountable in next years, but it is sure thing that it would be solved by the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: consume
...he threat of convenience food and still consume consume due to many factors. Some would argue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun costs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rds, they consider their expenditure on less costs fast foods as a wise choice. For ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ult, however, if you consume fast foods everyday the sum of money you have spent will be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relied on half sophisticated products. Despite all of this problems which have ...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...phisticated products. Despite all of this problems which have caused by fast food...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09253731343 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81768592579 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7446780829 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7894736842 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171680900476 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547819607216 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034043707231 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910288528098 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037158061154 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.