International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors. Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Many countries nowadays want to promote their tourism sector, and therefore, governments are opening countries’ doors and offer affordable tourism prices for visitors. Although this trend brings some negative effects, I believe that advantages can outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, the substantial number of international tourists probably leads to some problems. First of all, governments should take environmental issues into consideration. Local ecosystems have to shoulder a heavier burden of garbage from backpackers or exotic visitors unless appropriate interventions are implemented by native residents and authorities as well. Furthermore, many traditional activities can be modified to adapt to commercial purposes, and therefore, local traditions probably are superseded by commercial values instead of original ones.
On the other hand, we cannot deny that the surge in international travel is instrumental in developing countries. Firstly, important attractions which always are thronged with visitors play an integral source of profit in many countries. In Vietnam, both authorities and inhabitants gain a considerable amount of money from exotic tourists who pay a visit to tourism cities such as Da Nang, Hue or Quang Binh. Secondly, opening nation’s doors and offering cheaper fees in order to attract more foreign customers are effective ways to make a name in the international market. Through cultural activities such as dancing or selling traditional handicrafts, indigenous residents can propagate their locations to every corner of the world.
In conclusion, although national and local governments have to solve many negative consequences caused by places which always swarm with global visitors, the advantages of this trend can overwhelm the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...s. Firstly, important attractions which always are thronged with visitors play an integral...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90804597701 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22352263726 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4717942971 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194031085705 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606152072045 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636788736494 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108459203122 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644662158796 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.