it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions
With the increasing kinds of means for us to express our own opinions, whether we should read or watch news about opposite opinions becomes a hot-button topic on the air. As for me, I believe that it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions, because of getting objective prospective and embracing different ideas.
Most importantly, read or watch news about opposite opinions would lead us with an objective prospective. As is common sense, different people may have different perspective even after reading the same book or experiencing the same story. Therefore, our own idea may only show one side of problem in book or story. For example, my cousins Joe and Mark hold different opinions on whether online sharing bicycle should be allowed in the road. Joe, who rides the sharing bicycle every day, believes that online sharing bicycles have brought great convenience to the public, which could save us lots of time during traffic jam. However, Mark, who owns his cars for commute, is disagreed with Joe ideas, because he thinks that sharing bicycles bring the careless parking in the roads, which could be harmful to the view of the city. Although both of them are reasonable to us, they only consider their own side according to their own interest. Therefore, after the discussion, we can get a more general and objective prospective to the problem. On the contrary, if one only force himself to similar opinions, he may foster his subjective opinion again and again.
Additionally, opposite opinions can help us to open our mind to embrace different ideas, because opposite opinions can lead us to a brainstorm and even forming critical thinking in our mind. Thus, we could more easily accept different ideas from others, and then try to think about why others could hold this idea. It could facilitate the communication between people and increase the stability of society. Just like the discussion about online sharing bicycles, which is not only an argument between my cousin but also a hot topic in China, the administration always held the meeting between sharing bicycle user and non-user to discuss a better way to manage those sharing bicycle operation in Guangzhou. It not only eases the conflict between user and non-user, but also provides a better chance to understand each other.
Admittedly, some opposite opinions may not reasonable enough for us to accept, but our own opinion may have a similar problem we could not find out. According to opposite opinions, we may find out the problems of our own opinions or opposite opinions, which can greatly help us to develop a better idea or prospective for the future.
All in all, it seems to be safe to conclude that reading or watching news about opposite opinions may be more critical than those similar opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hot-button topic on the air. As for me, I believe that it could be more importan...
^^
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a hot topic in China, the administration always held the meeting between sharing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, as for, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 475.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99789473684 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5949928346 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.881764152 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.947368421 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396328929377 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136272891541 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15939937021 0.0667982634062 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302044657231 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165319161582 0.056905535591 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.