It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In this materialistic world, some people believe that experts like a sportsperson or a musician are born with talent in that field. However, others argue that any child can be taught to become anything. I believe that students should be taught in the field that they are interested in.
Talking about the people who are born with talents, they need a good teacher or coach to guide and to lead a successful career. As the people already have talent in that field, they can create wonders but it is their parents or teachers responsibility to encourage them and provide support. Thus, a talented person can contribute his work by winning awards to the society.
Coming to the other side, a child can be taught or trained to become a successful person or s musician only if that child shows interest and a good trainer trains him or her. Even if there is a good coach and trains the child, the results may be not up to the mark because the child is not interested in that field. Hence, selecting a child and train him to become something, may or may not work in all the situations.
My opinion is that, we should not start teaching a child to become an expert in one field, it is our responsibility to know if that child is interested in what we are teaching or what. Children born with talents should be recognised and support them in their path.
In conclusion, though people born with talents may not excell in all the cases and though a child who do not have talents, can be made an expert through proper training. Hence, we cannot say how a person can become an expert as there are many circumstances to consider as stated in the essay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teacher or coach to guide and to lead a successful career. As the people already...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52508361204 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52513012427 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471571906355 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1504340906 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273107939129 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111218449457 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693840992865 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160396346409 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717939253335 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.