It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imaginations and gained better language skills than people who prefer watching TV. Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imaginations and gained better language skills than people who prefer watching TV. Do you agree or disagree

It is widely believed that having an interest on books exerts much greater impact on boosting imaginary mind and gaining better language ability than glancing at programs on
Television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view thanks to the enormous benefits we can reap.
Firstly, a reader can possess not only extensive knowlege, but also creativity. Instead of including illustration or vivid images which watchers have an idea of the characters or happening things, most written materials have a range of structures and abstract, thereby forcing people to pick up their brain with a view to figuring out situations narruted if they want to keep up with plot. As a result, they are likely to enhance their creative thought which animated video fails to bring.
Secondly, people having a passion for books are likely to gain a deeper understanding on the skill of language. Unlike video which utilize a majority of spoken words, written sources such as literature provide a formal word and require readers to pay much attention to analyse their underlying meanings, improving their writing skills and better mastering language. Expressing their thoughts and emotions in much wiser and more logical format is as a result of applying knowledge from book. For example, my friend, a bookworm, has the ability to show her thought further better than the others in my class.
In conclusion, reading a book plays a vital role on shaping creativy and possessing better language skills. Therefore, it is highly recommended that each individual should form a habit of reading on their daily basis.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age ability than glancing at programs on Television. In my opinion, I completely ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14176245211 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68797362593 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662835249042 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5366676814 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158381302586 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574505799654 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581691434817 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796646523237 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382674384761 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.