Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things.
What are the reasons and provide some solutions?
With an unlimited access to education, entertainment and information, TV brings a diverse and fascinating world at the touch of a button. Hence, children excessively waste their time on watching TV regardless of taking the higher risk of being obesity or violent. There are some causes of this problem and several solutions proposed to tackle it.
The first reason is that the more overwhelming the workload is, the less attention to children parents pay. Clearly, instead of spending time on upbringing their kid, parents allow him to watch TV for self-education in order not to be bothered while they are working. The second root is the accelerating speed of entertainment industry. Inactiveness in youngster is born out of a sedentary lifestyle with never-ending animation shows on Disney Channel or BIBI TV.
However, a number of feasible solutions are suggested to deal with this challenging task. Firstly, it is parents’responsibilities to control children’s time on watching TV. For example, they can have their kids do the housework or recommend them going to friends’house. Also, schools should encourage students to participate in clubs, organize more physical competition and have picnics. As a result, students not only become seperated from TV but also have soft skills or make friends.
In conclusion, apparent explanations why children get addicted to TV and viable solutions are addressed to halt this issue effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unlimited access'.
Suggestion: unlimited access
With an unlimited access to education, entertainment and informa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their kid, parents allow him to watch TV for self-education in order not to be bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44690265487 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56279328151 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66814159292 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6938652756 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6923076923 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189981976638 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610849300496 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428653025719 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103149328008 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316820884608 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.