It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people claim that it is necessary for all urban areas to have open spaces for their citizens. Personally, I partly agree with this opinion because while these places can bring about several advantages, not all cities and towns can afford them.
On the one hand, open spaces such as squares or parks can be beneficial for everyone. Firstly, these places can be used to organize important events so that the government and attract tourists from other regions. To illustrate this point, music events at Dong Kinh Nghia Thuc Square, which is located in Hanoi city, are often held several times a month appeals to a large number of visitors. As a result, it might assist in generating much revenue for the country. Secondly, such spaces enable citizens to take part in physical activities so that they can improve their health. For instance, some people have a regular habit of doing exercise in the park with their friends, which contribute to the stronger connection among them.
On the other hand, it seems nearly imposible to build wide open spaces in all rural areas. One of the primary reasons is that because some cities have a shortage of land, they need to give priority to the construction of hospitals and schools to meet citizen’s basic demands. Another reason is that some towns have poor financial conditions. In fact, building public spaces required an enormous amount of money; therefore, if the government invest in constructing squares or parks, there will be less money spent on other important sectors such as education or accommodation.
In conclusion, I believe that although open spaces have several benefits including holding important events and improving citizens’ health, it is not possible for all cities to construct these places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n held several times a month appeals to a large number of visitors. As a result, it might assist ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08934707904 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57414237152 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4387094356 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342806238984 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108071735265 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616669518377 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200194161821 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112981632508 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.