Breathing fresh air is beneficial for one's health. Therefore, it is essential for all cities and towns to have huge public parks. I totally agree with the statement due to two reasons; adults and children both can breathe in fresh air and having more parks means more trees which in return is environment friendly.
Developing parks and squares in the vicinity contributes to healthy surroundings. Let's discuss how? By having attractive parks, which are being constructed properly by having play area for children and walking tracks for adults can have a positive impact on one's life. Because children will be tempted to come out of their houses and play in clean air, which further increase their chance of making new friends and exploring their surroundings. By doing so they spend less time on their tablets which is making their lives stagnant? Moreover, adults take long walk on the tracks breathing in fresh air. As it has been scientifically proved that walking in fresh air can reduce your stress level.
In addition to, having well developed parks with large amount of tress is ecofriendly. In today's age of multitude number of cars and factories is contributing more and more to air pollution which as a result is depleting our ozone layer. Therefore, having parks with nature can reduce the risk of all the diseases that can be caused by pollutants. Also, it adds to the beauty of the area.
To conclude, with my agreement, parks and squares must be built in humongous town and cities for children to play in vast area and to make our environment more pollution free.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
Breathing fresh air is beneficial for ones health. Therefore, it is essential for ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich in return is environment friendly. Developing parks and squares in the vici...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ty contributes to healthy surroundings. Lets discuss how? By having attractive parks...
^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...k on the tracks breathing in fresh air. As it has been scientifically proved that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91078066914 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58580049534 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561338289963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9531412803 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194341558632 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677971251944 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864034777004 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132825942746 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566851137082 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.