It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
One necessary comprehension in the early stage of a child’s growth is conscience, which is distinguishing between the right and the wrong. As a result, punishment for learning these skills has been a controversial issue. In my perspective, I am of the opinion that there are more helpful measures to motivate children acquiring new practical knowledge rather than punishment.
There appear several explanations for the negative impact on children’s development, which used punishment as a way to educate them. First and foremost, juveniles living in a harsh environment with frequent scolds fail to develop fully about identities as well as spirit. In this specific age, especially infant, they may not understand much about the surroundings and need generally the instruction from their foster parents and guardians to guide them on how to behave properly. Using sanctions in these cases may possibly lead to some unexpected consequences such as anxiety or even the depression. Additionally, there are some kind of punishment related to severe actions could result in a serious vulnerability in a child’s mental and physical health. Furthermore, observing some bad images children may imitate exactly and become aggressive, which leads to bullying and violence in a learning environment in the future.
Regarding some disadvantages above, to help teenage youngsters to be aware of the right and the wrong, teachers and parents should first provide good role modeling in their own behavior. It is an important way to improve their images in children’s eyes and open more opportunities for them to follow the good manner. In addition, there is a variety kind of disciplines such as detention, withdrawal of privileges, and time – out. Making these ways in suitable situations may make a contribution to effective changes in children’s behavior. A good illustration here is if a child received a warning and lack of caring from their parents in a period of time, they may feel the difference and have a regret attitude for what they had done. Apologizing to someone they have hurt or picking up rubbish they dropped off are small actions but could stimulate the perception as social responsibility when they are mature.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe that grasping the negative influence of sanctions and having more suitable solutions without punishment to children plays an important role in their development of cognitive power and behavior in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...roperly. Using sanctions in these cases may possibly lead to some unexpected consequences su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...roperly. Using sanctions in these cases may possibly lead to some unexpected consequences su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...epression. Additionally, there are some kind of punishment related to severe actions...
^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... lack of caring from their parents in a period of time, they may feel the difference and have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20676746359 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8551860531 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.3125 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229739968001 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655667861255 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461491414449 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133322209136 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372971831957 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.