It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last few decades, technological advancements have transformed the world radically. It is thought by some that this advancement challenges traditional roots and the traditions may be forgotten in the future, as a consequence, these two elements can coexist. This essay largely disagrees with this assertion as many nations in today’s world still have their customs and traditions preserved while they are technologically advanced.
Development in any field either in science or technology can never threaten the culture of a nation if its government spreads awareness about its traditional values. For instance, numerous Asian countries such as Japan, China and India are equipped with modern technology and still preserve their culture. The reason for this is the governments of all these states emphasis the local traditions by celebrating various festivals which connects its citizens with their heritage and customs. Thus, despite being well equipped with modern innovations a country can maintain its cultural roots intact.
However, few countries may not be able to maintain this balance due to the increased western influence technology brings. To demonstrate, youngsters in South Korean often refrain themselves to converse in their local dialect as they perceive English more important. This scenario only happens when a nation starts to follow foreign trends because of the lack of consciousness of their own unique identity.
In conclusion, it might seem technological developments challenge traditions and customs, but many countries are an example of this coexistence, in my opinion, these both can complement each other if people are not greatly influenced by western disturbance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly influenced by western disturbance.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69649805447 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0480067334 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8973404558 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155128010378 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608787902425 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397112277403 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947757771846 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484750538589 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.