It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree and disagree.
Different people holds their opinions differently regarding the effect of modern technologies cultural environment. The question is whether massive use of technology has adverse effect in our existing culture. The following essay examines this issue in detail and presents my opinion, which fully disagrees with the notion that technology advancement has such negative correlation.
To begin with, it is irrefutable to state that modern engineering has affected our life style in negative aspect, in some cases. Needless to say, with the advent of technology, certain groups of people are trying to misuse it in such a way that it has scattered our social feelings. For example, because of advancement of science and technology, various countries have created destructive weapons, which is biggest threat to human kind these days. To response of this, there is unhealthy competition between superior nations for designing and building more ruthless weapons. Thus, if there were no research and development in science and engineering, our world today would be very peaceful thereby reflecting harmony every in world.
However, I completely disagree with the overall statement that technology is curse for our culture and traditions. In fact, it has boosted and promoted our local cultural festival like never before due to its wide applied applications. A recent survey from Sociology department of Kathmandu University, for instance, have reported that in Nepal huge amount of people are following local festival more and more as compared to last five years. The primary reason for this progress is advancement in internet technologies, where social event are promoted and followed by numerous applications like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
To recapitulate, although there are some pitfalls of technology advancement but in my opinion it is a boon for our society. Furthermore, the above paragraphs have proved that it is a imperative source and pragmatic way for fostering our local culture. So, the idea that engineering tools are halting our cultural aspects is completely invalid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the biggest'.
Suggestion: is the biggest
...have created destructive weapons, which is biggest threat to human kind these days. To res...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersity, for instance, have reported that in Nepal huge amount of people are follo...
^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... following local festival more and more as compared to last five years. The primar...
^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...above paragraphs have proved that it is a imperative source and pragmatic way for...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50621118012 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93637933493 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0794846176 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749094467719 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027485940058 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208079402217 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491165312912 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106250847025 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.