It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Owing to enhancement in technology, old traditions have lost their impact. Many opine that tradition and automation cannot be managed together. In my view, technology and cultural values intertwine together.
In this contemporary era, many researches have been done in the field of science and automation to comfort life of mankind. Although advancement has created ease, originality of traditions has lost. In other words, due to the trend of online classes, the young generation will be missing the attractiveness and beauty of the classroom environment. In addition, the new inventions in architecture have led to the extinction of many traditions. To illustrate, in rural areas of Pakistan, houses was made of clay by local masons but now web designs have replaced them in infrastructure.
Despite variation in performance of daily activities, many people in various part of the world still follow their old traditions. In order to keep and protect the diversity of customs, it is followed and adopted in younger generations. For instance, in spite of an advanced country, China still promote their defensive techniques such as Kung Fu. Furthermore,telecommunications can be used to promote the culture and attract tourists. For example, many promotional and informative advertisements on the internet helps economy of PAKISTAN BY ATTRACTING MORE TOURISTS.By just one click, people can know about the unique customs of Pakistan. Moreover, technology of google map helps visitors to reach destination.
To conclude, IN MY OPINION, traditions and applied science can be handled together, as they augments the impact of each other in a positive way. In future experiments will be done to utilise their benefits as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , telecommunications
... techniques such as Kung Fu. Furthermore,telecommunications can be used to promote the culture and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtisements on the internet helps economy of PAKISTAN BY ATTRACTING MORE TOURISTS....
^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...of PAKISTAN BY ATTRACTING MORE TOURISTS.By just one click, people can know about t...
^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'augment'
Suggestion: augment
...cience can be handled together, as they augments the impact of each other in a positive ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... they augments the impact of each other in a positive way. In future experiments will be done to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44237918216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42982689025 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635687732342 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.873451691 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171053103688 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06117836599 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516050184969 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123452998061 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804317251325 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.