It can be easily seen while emergence of technology changed the life styles, past traditions became blurred. But does it mean they cannot stay in one place at the moment?
Technical progresses has dominated the mankind life in Contemporary era, almost all daily interactions were changed in a long spectrum from infinitesimal to huge shifts. Movement from the basic and costly methods of communication to the revolution of information today, from simple payment methods to professional financial tools and also from benign rural traditions to fast-moving metropolitan lifestyle.
During this quick shift, some traditions especially events related to handmade productions ruined. For example in the middle of summer in some rural areas in Iran, for harvesting productions a kind of ceremony were held mostly for praying and thanks to god. This ceremony is not alive now. Numerous ceremonies for different events were held which nowadays can only be found in history books.
Noticeably, interpreting this symptoms and generalizing one statement to whole traditional cultures may not seem true. Abundant habits and thoughts especially religion related cultures still strictly woven to the everyday lifes. Muslims do their assignments in almost every conditions and try to adapt what they believe with new emerging tools. For one instance all the efforts made to maintain banking system as new modern tool to their past belifes, which is called Islamic banking. Countless existing examples prove some past traditions were strong enough to be devastated by technical evolutions.
For sum up, accepting ruined old culturs by new changes, may not necessarily mean knife of technology is sharper, they can become together in daily lifes. Its up to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tory books. Noticeably, interpreting this symptoms and generalizing one statement...
^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ed cultures still strictly woven to the everyday lifes. Muslims do their assignments in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be devastated by technical evolutions. For sum up, accepting ruined old culturs...
^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...hey can become together in daily lifes. Its up to us.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43382352941 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84211864782 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650735294118 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2027568208 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102395573287 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332664858087 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031336043242 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055753317373 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363277587594 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.