Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space mo

The president of Humana University concluded from a bench-mark experience about online degree programs which are being held in nearby Omni University that starting these sort of courses in Humana University will not only soar overall enrollment rate but also will diminish budget and financial problems which are mainly suffered from increasing cost of buildings maintenance. Indeed, the conclusion lies on several faulty assumptions which are going to be investigated in paragraphs below.
First, the president assumes his university would optimistically succeed in absorbing new students in online courses similar to Omni University. By the far, this simplistic assumption contains a range of problems. There are abundant underlying reasons which guarantee the booming or failure of a business, including robust advertisement plans, quality of products, brand reputation, competitor analyses and etc. Only establishing an online system for providing internet-based classes will not necessarily guarantee an increment in rate of enrollments.
Second, the president roughly deduces that falling the expenditure of dormitory and classrooms in Omni University during recent years is likely related to establishing online programs. This weak assumption is also refuted. If the president wants to have a precise picture of expenditures, he must have clear information about the age of buildings, sort of facilities, rehabilitation programs in previous years, and so on. It would not be unlikely that Omni University allotted a considerable budget on rehabilitation programs in previous years and because of that, nowadays observers less yearly costs for routine maintenances. Similarly, if the president wants to lower down the expenditures for dormitories in his university, he must pay attention to information about age and quality of infrastructures in Humana University. Since much of the costs relating to maintenance of buildings caused by age and quality of facilities. For example, an aged piping system will definitely fail to properly pass fluids and show several adverse leakages, regardless of students present physically in the classes or off the classes.
Moreover, even if we postulate the analogous trends for maintenance costs among two universities, predicting that this projection will solve budget problems is vague. Indeed, instituting an online system for classes will charge huge expenses both for initial investment and for regular customer services. It seems that the professor does not have a clear view of these new costs which might be estimated over than he expects. Furthermore, the president does not have a precise information about the balance of budget in Omni university. As it is highly probable that Omni University might have been faced budget imbalances after projecting this new plan. Considering only some raw data about rate of enrollments and maintenance costs never could make a financial expert assured about the prosperous outcomes of a proposed plan.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...in nearby Omni University that starting these sort of courses in Humana University will no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to be investigated in paragraphs below First the president assumes his universi...
^^^
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntee an increment in rate of enrollments Second the president roughly deduces tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 1105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ically in the classes or off the classes Moreover even if we postulate the analog...
^^^
Line 4, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e prosperous outcomes of a proposed plan
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, for example, of course, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 451.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55875831486 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03709188523 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507760532151 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 820.8 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 19.7664670659 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 451.0 22.8473053892 1974% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 57.8364921388 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2507.0 119.503703932 2098% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 451.0 23.324526521 1934% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 99.0 5.70786347227 1734% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244358504778 0.218282227539 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244358504778 0.0743258471296 329% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146027291377 0.128457276422 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659946894198 0.0628817314937 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 230.3 14.3799401198 1602% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -403.21 48.3550499002 -834% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.1628742515 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 181.5 12.197005988 1488% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.45 12.5979740519 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.49 8.32208582834 366% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 128.0 98.500998004 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 12.3882235529 468% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 182.4 11.1389221557 1638% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 182.0 11.9071856287 1528% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 451 350
No. of Characters: 2502 1500
No. of Different Words: 237 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.608 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.548 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.044 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 194 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 159 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 123 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 91 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.477 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.314 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5