It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Technology has been increasing for several decades and along with it, people are engaging more. There are high chances that traditional cultures will be lost as the technology grows. Technology and traditional culture are not made for each other. In my opinion, technology should be separated during traditional cultures.
During festivals, People are engaging their precious time in mobile phones, television, etc. rather being social with each other. Some people can not get rid of their office work. It can affect adversely their mood and also can escalate stress. For instance, During weddings, 1 out of 10 grooms are busy on their phone with work, while their brides are arriving on the stage. This results in loss of cherished moments and memories. It also affects the etiquettes of a person in crowded places.
Furthermore, children are highly affected because of this, their interest and beliefs are getting vanished day by day. It is widely known that children seek education from their parents. If the parents are oriented towards technology itself, children will be going to do the same and apply the same strategies to the next generation. Moreover, the small changes in them will lead to the end of cultural activities, and someday there will be no traditional activity left among human.
In conclusion, people should engage more in traditional activities, leaving their technology aside. They should spend more time with each other rather than their mobile phones. Parents should teach more about the tradition to their children, further generations are dependent on them. Although technology can be useful sometimes, during a festive time it should it be kept aside.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60349295812 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9774290094 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3157894737 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2105263158 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266079873602 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093635239403 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10615683018 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186945633101 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130363537814 0.056905535591 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.