It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people think that it is better if young children spend time studying history of neighbourhood rather than that of the world. Personally, I completely disagree with this opinion because I believe world histories and local ones are equally important.
To begin with, there are several good reasons why school boys and girls should learn the history of their locals. The first one is that the past of their cities or towns can make it more interesting and real for children to study history. For example, when learners visit historical sites mentioned in textbooks in their neighbourhood, they would feel more familiar and easier to this subject at school. Students therefore find learning history less tedious compared to memorising events and dates alone. Another reason is that local histories help shape who you are. Since local norms might significantly influence the behaviours of individuals, accumulating knowledge about people and things happened in the place where they live allows youngsters to gain insight into their origins as well as their local cultures.
However, I would argue that it is also important for schoolchildren to learn world history due to its benefits. Firstly, as the world has become globalised, every child better prepares knowledge of events that had huge impacts on the world in order to grow up as future global citizens. Actually, a global citizen is simply a national citizen who knows and cares about the history and contemporary affairs of all humankind. Besides, learning about the world in the past helps students understand how and why the world got to be this way as because it gives attention to the histories of other nations, civilisation and the differences among them. This may lead children to develop critical thinking by evaluating information.
In conclusion, I suppose that school children need to study both local and world history. There is not one that is less important than the other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18296529968 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70321419342 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9109944466 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331289550933 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102966535917 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571804616053 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191194365066 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011653729379 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.